AbstractBackground/ObjectivesThe use of mobile ophthalmology applications (MOA) is increasing, but many of these tools have not been validated. This study was performed to assess the accuracy of a popular MOA, Eye Handbook, in measuring five commonly-tested vision assessment parameters (distance visual acuity (DVA), near visual acuity (NVA), colour vision testing (CVT), contrast sensitivity (CS), and pupillary distance (PD)) was compared with traditional vision assessment methods (TVAM) [i.e.

摘要背景/目的移动眼科应用程序（MOA）的使用正在增加，但其中许多工具尚未得到验证。本研究旨在评估流行的MOA《眼科手册》在测量五个常用的视力评估参数（距离视力（DVA）、近视力（NVA）、色觉测试（CVT）、对比敏感度（CS）和瞳孔距离（PD））方面的准确性，并与传统的视力评估方法（TVAM）进行比较。

Snellen chart, Rosenbaum near card, Ishihara, Pelli Robson test, etc.] performed in the eye clinic setting.Subjects/MethodsProspective crossover clinical trial of 129 patients meeting inclusion criteria.ResultsParticipants averaged significantly better DVA (p = 0.0008), NVA (p < 0.0001), and CVT (p = 0.0105) in the MOA than the TVAM, but all three MOA assessments were predictive of the TVAM values.

。受试者/方法对129例符合纳入标准的患者进行前瞻性交叉临床试验。结果参与者平均DVA（p=0.0008），NVA（p<0.0001）和CVT（p=0.0105）明显优于TVA，但所有三种MOA评估均能预测TVA值。

CS was significantly better with the MOA (p < 0.0001). Linear regression and Spearman correlation tests were applied to assess the effect of CS on NVA, which showed no clear relationship between the difference in NVA and the difference in CS. PD using the two methods was in agreement with no significant difference (p = 0.2889).ConclusionThe studied MOA offers an effective means of measuring four common vision parameters: DVA, NVA, CVT, and PD.

MOA的CS明显更好（p<0.0001）。应用线性回归和Spearman相关检验评估CS对NVA的影响，结果显示NVA差异与CS差异之间没有明确的关系。使用两种方法的PD一致，无显着差异（p=0.2889）。结论所研究的MOA为测量DVA，NVA，CVT和PD四种常见视觉参数提供了有效的手段。

The MOA can potentially be used by eye care providers, health care providers, and patients, both as a screening tool with correction factor and to monitor ocular pathologies. Atypical MOA measurements should prompt testing in the clinic with formal TVAMs..

MOA可能被眼科护理提供者，医疗保健提供者和患者用作具有校正因子的筛查工具和监测眼部病变。非典型MOA测量应促使临床使用正式的TVAMs进行测试。。

Access through your institution

通过您的机构访问

Buy or subscribe

购买或订阅

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

这是订阅内容的预览，可通过您的机构访问

Access options

访问选项

Access through your institution

通过您的机构访问

Access through your institution

通过您的机构访问

Change institution

变革机构

Buy or subscribe

购买或订阅

Subscribe to this journalReceive 18 print issues and online access251,40 € per yearonly 13,97 € per issueLearn moreBuy this articlePurchase on SpringerLinkInstant access to full article PDFBuy nowPrices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

订阅本期刊每年可收到18期印刷版和在线访问251,40欧元每期仅13,97欧元了解更多在SpringerLink上购买本文立即访问全文PDFBuy NOW价格可能需要缴纳结帐时计算的当地税费

Additional access options:

其他访问选项：

Log in

登录

Learn about institutional subscriptions

了解机构订阅

Read our FAQs

阅读我们的常见问题

Contact customer support

联系客户支持

Fig. 1

图1

Data availability

数据可用性

The data collected and analysed in this study are not publicly available due to institutional policy and concerns for protecting protected health information (PHI). However, de-identified datasets can be shared with reasonable requests made in writing to the corresponding author. These requests will be reviewed and are subject to subsequent institutional administration approval for the release of the data sets..

由于机构政策和保护受保护健康信息（PHI）的担忧，本研究中收集和分析的数据尚未公开。但是，可以通过向相应作者提出合理的书面请求来共享未识别的数据集。将对这些请求进行审查，并在随后的机构管理部门批准后发布数据集。。

ReferencesAruljyothi L, Janakiraman A, Malligarjun B, Babu BM. Smartphone applications in ophthalmology: a quantitative analysis. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2021;69:548–53.Article

参考文献Aruljyothi L，Janakiraman A，Malligarjun B，Babu BM。智能手机在眼科的应用：定量分析。印度J眼科。2021年；69:548-53.文章

PubMed

PubMed

PubMed Central

公共医学中心

Google Scholar

谷歌学者

Leonard C. Reference apps for ophthalmologists. 2021. https://www.reviewofophthalmology.com/article/reference-apps-for-ophthalmologists.Znamenska M. Top 11 mobile optometry & ophthalmology mobile apps. 2023. https://www.altris.ai/article/top-mobile-optometry-ophthalmology-apps-for-eye-care-specialists/.Davidson J.

。2021https://www.reviewofophthalmology.com/article/reference-apps-for-ophthalmologists.ZnamenskaM.前11名移动验光和眼科移动应用程序。2023https://www.altris.ai/article/top-mobile-optometry-ophthalmology-apps-for-eye-care-specialists/.DavidsonJ。

Top 10 optometry smartphone apps. 2020. https://modernod.com/articles/2020-apr/top-10-optometry-smartphone-apps?c4src=article%3Ainfinite-scroll.Lord K, Shah VA, Krishna R. The Eye Handbook: a mobile app in ophthalmic medicine. Mo Med. 2013;110:49–51.PubMed .

十大验光智能手机应用程序。2020https://modernod.com/articles/2020-apr/top-10-optometry-smartphone-apps?c4src=article%3Ainfinite-滚动。Lord K，Shah VA，Krishna R.《眼科手册：眼科医学中的移动应用程序》。Mo医学2013；110:49-51。PubMed。

PubMed Central

公共医学中心

Google Scholar

谷歌学者

Yeung WK, Dawes P, Pye A, Neil M, Aslam T, Dickinson C, et al. eHealth tools for the self-testing of visual acuity: a scoping review. NPJ Digit Med. 2019;2:82.Article

Yeung WK，Dawes P，Pye A，Neil M，Aslam T，Dickinson C等。用于视力自我测试的电子健康工具：范围界定评论。NPJ数字医学2019；2： 82、条款

PubMed

PubMed

PubMed Central

公共医学中心

Google Scholar

谷歌学者

Tofigh S, Shortridge E, Elkeeb A, Godley BF. Effectiveness of a smartphone application for testing near visual acuity. Eye (Lond). 2015;29:1464–8.Article

Tofigh S，Shortridge E，Elkeeb A，Godley BF。智能手机应用程序测试近视力的有效性。眼睛（Lond）。2015年；29:1464-8.文章

CAS

中科院

PubMed

PubMed

Google Scholar

谷歌学者

Shah AA, Pasadhika S, Kim J, Wang M. Pseudoisochromatic color vision testing on an iPhone. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53:6399.

Shah AA，Pasadhika S，Kim J，Wang M.在iPhone上进行伪等色色觉测试。投资眼科Vis Sci。2012年；53:6399。

Google Scholar

谷歌学者

Cho P, Woo GC. Repeatability of the Waterloo four-contrast logMAR visual acuity chart and near vision test card on a group of normal young adults. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2004;24:427–35.Article

Cho P，Woo GC。滑铁卢四对比度logMAR视力表和近视力测试卡对一组正常年轻人的可重复性。眼科生理学Opt。2004年；24:427–35.文章

PubMed

PubMed

Google Scholar

谷歌学者

Kaur K, Gurnani B. Contrast sensitivity. [Updated 2023 Jun 11]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2023 Jan. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK580542/Cheng L, Peng S, Hao H, Ye D, Xu L, Zuo Y, et al. Effect of different screen brightness and devices on online visual acuity test.

Kaur K，Gurnani B.对比敏感度。[于2023年6月11日更新]。在：StatPearls[互联网]。金银岛（佛罗里达）：StatPearls出版社；2023年1月可从以下网站获得：https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK580542/ChengL，Peng S，Hao H，Ye D，Xu L，Zuo Y，等。不同屏幕亮度和设备对在线视力测试的影响。

Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2024;262:641–9.Article .

Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol。2024年；262:641-9。文章。

PubMed

PubMed

Google Scholar

谷歌学者

Download referencesAcknowledgementsJibran Sharieff, MD (PGY-1 ophthalmology resident at Dean McGee Eye Institute) assisted with instruction on testing methods and manuscript editing.Author informationAuthor notesThese authors contributed equally: Austin Raney, Savannah Cottom.Authors and AffiliationsDepartment of Ophthalmology, Dean McGee Eye Institute, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, 608 Stanton L.

下载参考文献致谢医学博士Jibran Sharieff（院长麦基眼科研究所PGY-1眼科住院医师）协助指导测试方法和稿件编辑。。作者和附属机构俄克拉荷马大学健康科学中心Dean McGee眼科研究所眼科，608 Stanton L。

Young Blvd, Oklahoma City, OK, 73104, USAAustin Raney, Savannah Cottom, Jonathan Huff, Tavis Phan, Austin LaGrow, Christian Leal & Kamran M. RiazCollege of Medicine, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, USAAustin Raney, Savannah Cottom, Jonathan Huff & Tavis PhanDepartment of Ophthalmology, Emory University, 100 Woodruff Circle, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USAChristian LealDepartment of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USAJustin D.

俄克拉荷马州俄克拉荷马市Young Blvd，俄克拉荷马州，73104，USAAustin Raney，Savannah Cottom，Jonathan Huff，Tavis Phan，Austin LaGrow，Christian Leal＆Kamran M.RiazCollege of Medicine，俄克拉荷马大学，诺曼，俄克拉荷马州，USAAustin Raney，Savannah Cottom，Jonathan Huff＆Tavis Phan100 Woodruff Circle，佐治亚州亚特兰大，30322，美国基督教LealdDepartment of Biostatistics and Epidemiology，俄克拉荷马大学健康科学中心，俄克拉荷马州，USAJustin D。

DvorakAuthorsAustin RaneyView author publicationsYou can also search for this author in.

DvorakauthorsAustinRaneyview作者出版物您也可以在中搜索此作者。

PubMed Google ScholarSavannah CottomView author publicationsYou can also search for this author in

PubMed Google ScholarSavannah CottomView作者出版物您也可以在

PubMed Google ScholarJonathan HuffView author publicationsYou can also search for this author in

PubMed Google ScholarJonathanHuffview作者出版物您也可以在

PubMed Google ScholarTavis PhanView author publicationsYou can also search for this author in

PubMed Google ScholarTavis PhanView作者出版物您也可以在

PubMed Google ScholarAustin LaGrowView author publicationsYou can also search for this author in

PubMed Google ScholarAustin LaGrowView作者出版物您也可以在

PubMed Google ScholarChristian LealView author publicationsYou can also search for this author in

PubMed Google ScholarChristian LealView作者出版物您也可以在

PubMed Google ScholarJustin D. DvorakView author publicationsYou can also search for this author in

PubMed Google ScholarJustin D.DvorakView作者出版物您也可以在

PubMed Google ScholarKamran M. RiazView author publicationsYou can also search for this author in

PubMed Google ScholarKamran M.RiazView作者出版物您也可以在

PubMed Google ScholarContributionsAR and SC were responsible for supervising and conducting the research; extracting and analysing data; interpreting results; and writing the first draft of the manuscript. JH, TP, AL, and CL were responsible for conducting the data gathering; extracting and analysing the data; and creating tables and figures.

PubMed Google ScholarContributionsAR和SC负责监督和进行研究；提取和分析数据；解释结果；并撰写手稿的初稿。JH，TP，AL和CL负责进行数据收集；提取和分析数据；以及创建表格和数字。

JDD was responsible for the primary statistical analysis for the study. KMR was responsible for supervising all study participants; reviewing the collected data; and editing and finalizing the submitted final draft of the manuscript.Corresponding authorCorrespondence to.

JDD负责该研究的主要统计分析。KMR负责监督所有研究参与者；审查收集的数据；并编辑和定稿提交的稿件定稿。对应作者对应。

Kamran M. Riaz.Ethics declarations

卡姆兰·M·里亚兹。道德宣言

Competing interests

相互竞争的利益

The authors declare no competing interests.

。

Additional informationPublisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.Supplementary informationSupplemental Figure 1Supplemental Figure 2Supplemental Figure 3Supplemental Figure 4Supplemental Figure 5Supplemental Figures ledgendsRights and permissionsSpringer Nature or its licensor (e.g.

Additional informationPublisher的注释Springer Nature在已发布的地图和机构隶属关系中的管辖权主张方面保持中立。补充信息补充图1补充图2补充图3补充图4补充图5补充图分类帐权利和许可证原告性质或其许可人（例如。

a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.Reprints and permissionsAbout this articleCite this articleRaney, A., Cottom, S., Huff, J.

协会或其他合作伙伴）根据与作者或其他权利持有人的出版协议对本文拥有专有权；本文接受稿件版本的作者自行存档仅受此类出版协议和适用法律的条款管辖。转载和许可本文引用本文Raney，A.，Cottom，S.，Huff，J。

et al. Accuracy of a commonly used mobile ophthalmology application’s vision assessment tools in measuring five vision assessment parameters..

等人。常用移动眼科应用程序的视力评估工具在测量五个视力评估参数方面的准确性。。

Eye (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-024-03315-7Download citationReceived: 10 October 2023Revised: 03 August 2024Accepted: 23 August 2024Published: 02 September 2024DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-024-03315-7Share this articleAnyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:Get shareable linkSorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.Copy to clipboard.

眼睛（2024）。https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-024-03315-7Download引文接收日期：2023年10月10日修订日期：2024年8月3日接受日期：2024年8月23日发布日期：2024年9月2日OI：https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-024-03315-7Share本文与您共享以下链接的任何人都可以阅读此内容：获取可共享链接对不起，本文目前没有可共享的链接。复制到剪贴板。

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

由Springer Nature SharedIt内容共享计划提供