商务合作
动脉网APP
可切换为仅中文
AbstractDuring the last decades, effective pain reduction and early mobilization were identified as the central priorities in therapy of insufficiency fractures of the pelvis. For operative treatment minimally-invasive stabilization techniques are favored. While there is consensus on the significance of sufficient dorsal stabilization the role of additional fixation of the anterior fracture component stays under discussion.
摘要在过去的几十年中,有效的疼痛减轻和早期动员被确定为骨盆不全骨折治疗的核心优先事项。对于手术治疗,微创稳定技术受到青睐。虽然对足够的背侧稳定的重要性达成了共识,但前部骨折组件的额外固定的作用仍在讨论中。
Within the present study we developed an internal ring fixator system (RingFix) with the question whether an in-itself-closed construct can improve stability of the entire ring structure. RingFix was evaluated on an osteoporotic bone model with a standardized FFP IIIc fracture within an established biomechanical setup regarding its primary stabilization potential.
。RingFix在骨质疏松骨模型上进行了评估,该模型在已建立的生物力学设置中具有标准化的FFP IIIc骨折,其主要稳定潜力。
Further, it was compared to transiliac–transsacral screw fixation with and without stabilization of the anterior fracture component. The transiliac–transsacral fixation with separate screw fixation of the anterior fracture showed significantly higher stability than the RingFix and the transiliac–transsacral screw fixation without anterior stabilization.
此外,将其与经髂骨-经骶骨螺钉固定进行了比较,无论是否稳定前骨折组件。经髂-经骶骨固定与前骨折的单独螺钉固定相比,稳定性显着高于RingFix和经髂-经骶骨螺钉固定而无前稳定。
Our results show that stabilization of the anterior fracture component relevantly improves the stability of the entire ring construct. As a bridging stabilizer, RingFix shows biomechanical advantages over an isolated dorsal fracture fixation, but inferior results than direct stabilization of the single fracture components..
我们的研究结果表明,前骨折组件的稳定相对提高了整个环结构的稳定性。作为桥接稳定器,RingFix在生物力学上优于孤立的背侧骨折固定,但效果不如直接稳定单个骨折组件。。
IntroductionThe observed increasing incidence of fragility fractures of the pelvis (FFP) led to a special interest in these pathologies over the last decade and opened a wide field of research1,2. With the successful implementation of specific classification systems, treatment recommendations and algorithms were contrived3,4,5.
引言在过去的十年中,观察到骨盆脆性骨折(FFP)发病率的增加引起了人们对这些病理学的特别兴趣,并开辟了广泛的研究领域1,2。随着特定分类系统的成功实施,提出了治疗建议和算法3,4,5。
The central objective in treatment of affected, typically frail patients is a sufficient pain control to allow for early remobilization. Analgesic therapy and physiotherapeutic mobilization is regarded as the primary therapy in isolated anterior (FFP I) and non-displaced posterior fractures (FFP II)3.
治疗受影响的,通常身体虚弱的患者的中心目标是足够的疼痛控制,以允许早期再活动。。
In patients with posteriorly displaced fractures (FFP III and FFP IV) or with prolonged pain and thereof immobilization, surgical treatment is recommended6. The objective of surgical intervention in those patients is not an anatomical reduction but a stable in-situ fixation to achieve sufficient pain control and to allow for immediate postoperative remobilization of the patient.
对于后移位骨折(FFP III和FFP IV)或长期疼痛及其固定的患者,建议进行手术治疗6。对这些患者进行手术干预的目的不是解剖复位,而是稳定的原位固定,以实现足够的疼痛控制并允许患者术后立即再活动。
Further, the surgical therapy should be as minimally-invasive as possible to minimize surgically-related complications in this fragile patient group with commonly reduced bone quality. While there is consensus about the necessity of a stable fixation of the posterior pelvic ring, discussion remains controversial about indications and methods for stabilization of the anterior fracture part.For minimal-invasive stabilization of the posterior pelvic ring in FFP, different percutaneous (trans-) iliosacral7,8,9,10,11,12,13 and transiliac internal fixation techniques14,15 are described.
此外,手术治疗应尽可能微创,以尽量减少这种骨质量通常降低的脆弱患者组的手术相关并发症。虽然关于骨盆后环稳定固定的必要性已达成共识,但关于稳定前骨折部分的适应症和方法的讨论仍存在争议。为了微创稳定FFP中的后盆腔环,描述了不同的经皮(经)髂骶7,8,9,10,11,12,13和经髂内固定技术14,15。
The anterior fracture component is often left without fixation2,16. However, the placement of an internal17,18 or external fixator19, percutaneous screw fixation of the superior pubic ramus16,20,21.
前部骨折组件通常没有固定2,16。。
(1)
(1)
An in-itself closed internal ring fixator construct (RingFix) does not show any advantages over in-situ stabilization of the posterior and anterior fracture components of an unstable FFP type.
与不稳定FFP类型的前后骨折组件的原位稳定相比,本身封闭的内固定器构建体(RingFix)没有任何优势。
(2)
(2)
Fixation of the anterior fracture significantly improves the stability of the entire pelvic ring construct.
。
Data availability
数据可用性
Raw data were generated at University Medical Center of Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Germany. Derived data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author [C.A.] on request.
。支持本研究结果的衍生数据可应要求从通讯作者[C.A.)处获得。
ReferencesHeiman, E. et al. Fragility fractures of the pelvis and sacrum: Current trends in literature. Hip Pelvis 34(2), 69–78 (2022).Article
参考文献Heiman,E。等人。骨盆和骶骨的脆性骨折:文献的当前趋势。髋骨骨盆34(2),69-78(2022)。文章
PubMed
PubMed
PubMed Central
公共医学中心
Google Scholar
谷歌学者
Wilson, D. G. G., Kelly, J. & Rickman, M. Operative management of fragility fractures of the pelvis - a systematic review. BMC Musculoskel. Disord. 22(1), 717 (2021).Article
Wilson,D.G.G.,Kelly,J。&Rickman,M。骨盆脆性骨折的手术治疗-系统评价。BMC肌肉骨骼。混乱。22(1),717(2021)。文章
Google Scholar
谷歌学者
Rommens, P. M. & Hofmann, A. Comprehensive classification of fragility fractures of the pelvic ring: Recommendations for surgical treatment. Injury 44(12), 1733–1744 (2013).Article
Rommens,P.M。&Hofmann,A。骨盆环脆性骨折的综合分类:手术治疗的建议。伤害44(12),1733-1744(2013)。文章
PubMed
PubMed
Google Scholar
谷歌学者
Krappinger, D., Kaser, V., Merkel, A., Neururer, S. & Lindtner, R. A. An alphanumeric classification of osteoporotic pelvic ring injuries. Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg. 141(5), 861–869 (2021).Article
Krappinger,D.,Kaser,V.,Merkel,A.,Neurer,S。&Lindtner,R.A。骨质疏松性骨盆环损伤的字母数字分类。拱门。骨科。创伤外科141(5),861-869(2021)。文章
PubMed
PubMed
Google Scholar
谷歌学者
Ullrich, B. W. et al. OF-Pelvis classification of osteoporotic sacral and pelvic ring fractures. BMC Musculoskel. Disord. 22(1), 992 (2021).Article
Ullrich,B.W.等人关于骨质疏松性骶骨和骨盆环骨折的骨盆分类。BMC肌肉骨骼。混乱。22(1),992(2021)。文章
Google Scholar
谷歌学者
Rommens, P. M. et al. Prospective assessment of key factors influencing treatment strategy and outcome of fragility fractures of the pelvis (FFP). Eur. J. Trauma Emerg. Surg. 48(4), 3243–3256 (2022).Article
Rommens,P.M.等人。骨盆脆性骨折(FFP)治疗策略和疗效关键因素的前瞻性评估。《欧洲创伤急诊外科杂志》48(4),3243-3256(2022)。文章
PubMed
PubMed
PubMed Central
公共医学中心
Google Scholar
谷歌学者
van Zwienen, C. M., van den Bosch, E. W., Snijders, C. J., Kleinrensink, G. J. & van Vugt, A. B. Biomechanical comparison of sacroiliac screw techniques for unstable pelvic ring fractures. J. Orthop. Trauma 18(9), 589–595 (2004).Article
van Zwienen,C.M.,van den Bosch,E.W.,Snijders,C.J.,Kleinrensink,G.J。&van Vugt,A.B。骶髂螺钉技术治疗不稳定骨盆环骨折的生物力学比较。J、 骨科。。文章
PubMed
PubMed
Google Scholar
谷歌学者
Hartensuer, R. et al. Safety, effect and feasibility of percutaneous SI-screw with and without augmentation-a 15-year retrospective analysis on over 640 screws. J. Clin. Med. 9(8), 2660 (2020).Article
Hartensuer,R。等人。经皮SI螺钉加和不加增强的安全性、有效性和可行性——对640多个螺钉的15年回顾性分析。J、 临床。医学杂志9(8),2660(2020)。文章
PubMed
PubMed
PubMed Central
公共医学中心
Google Scholar
谷歌学者
Zderic, I. et al. Screw-in-screw fixation of fragility sacrum fractures provides high stability without loosening-biomechanical evaluation of a new concept. J. Orthop. Res. 39(4), 761–770 (2021).Article
Zderic,I。等人。螺钉固定脆弱性骶骨骨折可提供高稳定性,而不会松动新概念的生物力学评估。J、 骨科。第39(4)号决议,第761–770(2021)号决议。文章
CAS
中科院
PubMed
PubMed
Google Scholar
谷歌学者
Mehling, I., Hessmann, M. H. & Rommens, P. M. Stabilization of fatigue fractures of the dorsal pelvis with a trans-sacral bar. Operative technique and outcome. Injury 43(4), 446–451 (2012).Article
Mehling,I.,Hessmann,M.H。&Rommens,P.M。用经骶杆稳定骨盆背侧疲劳骨折。手术技术和结果。伤害43(4),446-451(2012)。文章
PubMed
PubMed
Google Scholar
谷歌学者
Sciubba, D. M. et al. CT fluoroscopically guided percutaneous placement of transiliosacral rod for sacral insufficiency fracture: Case report and technique. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 28(8), 1451–1454 (2007).Article
Sciubba,D.M。等。CT荧光镜引导下经皮骶骨棒置入治疗骶骨功能不全骨折:病例报告和技术。AJNR Am.J.神经放射学。28(8),1451-1454(2007)。文章
CAS
中科院
PubMed
PubMed
PubMed Central
公共医学中心
Google Scholar
谷歌学者
Wagner, D. et al. Trans-sacral bar osteosynthesis provides low mortality and high mobility in patients with fragility fractures of the pelvis. Sci. Rep. 11(1), 14201 (2021).Article
Wagner,D。等人。经骶骨棒接骨术为骨盆脆性骨折患者提供了低死亡率和高活动性。科学。代表11(1),14201(2021)。文章
ADS
广告
CAS
中科院
PubMed
PubMed
PubMed Central
公共医学中心
Google Scholar
谷歌学者
Rommens, P. M. et al. Minimally invasive stabilization of fragility fractures of the pelvis with transsacral bar and retrograde transpubic screw. Oper. Orthop. Traumatol. 34(2), 153–171 (2022).Article
Rommens,P.M.等人。经骶杆和逆行经肘螺钉微创稳定骨盆脆性骨折。操作。骨科。创伤。34(2),153-171(2022)。文章
PubMed
PubMed
Google Scholar
谷歌学者
Rommens, P. M. et al. Fragility fractures of the pelvis. Unfallchirurg. 122(6), 469–482 (2019).Article
Rommens,P.M.等人,《骨盆脆性骨折》。Unfallchirurg.122(6),469-482(2019)。文章
PubMed
PubMed
Google Scholar
谷歌学者
Muller, F. & Fuchtmeier, B. A systematic review of the transiliac internal fixator (TIFI) for posterior pelvic injuries. SICOT J. 7, 40 (2021).Article
Muller,F。&Fuchtmeier,B。经髂内固定器(TIFI)治疗骨盆后部损伤的系统评价。《西科特杂志》第7卷第40页(2021年)。文章
PubMed
PubMed
PubMed Central
公共医学中心
Google Scholar
谷歌学者
Arand, C. et al. Do we need to fix the anterior fracture component in insufficiency fractures of the pelvis? A biomechanical comparison on an FFP type IIIc fracture in an osteoporotic pelvic bone model. Injury 54, 111096 (2023).Article
Arand,C。等人。骨盆不全骨折需要固定前部骨折部件吗?骨质疏松性骨盆骨模型中FFP IIIc型骨折的生物力学比较。伤害54111096(2023)。文章
PubMed
PubMed
Google Scholar
谷歌学者
Yin, Y. et al. Anterior subcutaneous internal fixator (INFIX) versus plate fixation for pelvic anterior ring fracture. Sci. Rep. 9(1), 2578 (2019).Article
Yin,Y.等。骨盆前环骨折的前皮下内固定器(INFIX)与钢板固定的比较。科学。代表9(1),2578(2019)。文章
ADS
广告
PubMed
PubMed
PubMed Central
公共医学中心
Google Scholar
谷歌学者
Apivatthakakul, T. & Rujiwattanapong, N. Anterior subcutaneous pelvic internal fixator (INFIX), Is it safe? A cadaveric study. Injury 47(10), 2077–2080 (2016).Article
Apivathakakul,T。&Rujiwattanapong,N。前皮下骨盆内固定器(中缀),安全吗?尸体研究。。文章
CAS
中科院
PubMed
PubMed
Google Scholar
谷歌学者
Schuetze, K. et al. Short-term outcome of fragility fractures of the pelvis in the elderly treated with screw osteosynthesis and external fixator. Eur. J. Trauma Emerg. Surg. 48(3), 2413–2420 (2022).Article
Schuetze,K。等人。用螺钉接骨术和外固定器治疗老年人骨盆脆性骨折的短期结果。《欧洲创伤急诊外科杂志》48(3),2413-2420(2022)。文章
PubMed
PubMed
Google Scholar
谷歌学者
Rommens, P. M. et al. Minimal-invasive stabilization of anterior pelvic ring fractures with retrograde transpubic screws. Injury 51(2), 340–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2019.12.018 (2020).Article
Rommens,P.M.等。逆行经肘螺钉微创固定骨盆前环骨折。。https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2019.12.018(2020年)。文章
PubMed
PubMed
Google Scholar
谷歌学者
Mosheiff, R. & Liebergall, M. Maneuvering the retrograde medullary screw in pubic ramus fractures. J. Orthop. Trauma 16(8), 594–596 (2002).Article
Mosheiff,R。&Liebergall,M。操纵逆行髓样螺钉治疗耻骨支骨折。J、 骨科。创伤16(8),594-596(2002)。文章
PubMed
PubMed
Google Scholar
谷歌学者
Herteleer, M., Boudissa, M., Hofmann, A., Wagner, D. & Rommens, P. M. Plate fixation of the anterior pelvic ring in patients with fragility fractures of the pelvis. Eur. J. Trauma Emerg. Surg. 48(5), 3711–3719 (2022).Article
。《欧洲创伤急诊外科杂志》48(5),3711-3719(2022)。文章
PubMed
PubMed
Google Scholar
谷歌学者
Starr, A. J., Nakatani, T., Reinert, C. M. & Cederberg, K. Superior pubic ramus fractures fixed with percutaneous screws: What predicts fixation failure?. J. Orthop. Trauma 22(2), 81–87 (2008).Article
Starr,A.J.,Nakatani,T.,Reinert,C.M。和Cederberg,K。用经皮螺钉固定的耻骨上支骨折:什么预示着固定失败?。J、 骨科。。文章
PubMed
PubMed
Google Scholar
谷歌学者
Dalstra, M. & Huiskes, R. Load transfer across the pelvic bone. J. Biomech. 28(6), 715–724 (1995).Article
Dalstra,M。&Huiskes,R。跨越骨盆的负荷转移。J、 生物技术。28(6),715-724(1995)。文章
CAS
中科院
PubMed
PubMed
Google Scholar
谷歌学者
Kramers-de Quervain, I. A. Ganganalyse beim Gehen und Laufen. Schweiz. Z. Sportmed. Sporttraumatol. 56(2), 35–42 (2008).
Kramers de Quervain,I.A.行走和跑步时的步态分析。瑞士。Z.体育。运动创伤。56(2), 35–42 (2008).
Google Scholar
谷歌学者
Rommens, P. M. et al. Clinical pathways for fragility fractures of the pelvic ring: Personal experience and review of the literature. J. Orthop. Sci. 20(1), 1–11 (2015).Article
Rommens,P.M.等。骨盆环脆性骨折的临床路径:个人经验和文献回顾。J、 骨科。科学。20(1),1-11(2015)。文章
PubMed
PubMed
Google Scholar
谷歌学者
Cintean, R. et al. Sacroiliac versus transiliac–transsacral screw osteosynthesis in osteoporotic pelvic fractures: A biomechanical comparison. Eur. J. Trauma Emerg. Surg. 49(6), 2553–2560. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-023-02341-6 (2023).Article
Cintean,R。等人。骨质疏松性骨盆骨折中骶髂关节与经髂关节-经骶骨螺钉接骨术:生物力学比较。《欧洲创伤急诊外科杂志》49(6),2553-2560。https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-023-02341-6(2023年)。文章
PubMed
PubMed
PubMed Central
公共医学中心
Google Scholar
谷歌学者
Dienstknecht, T. et al. Biomechanical analysis of a transiliac internal fixator. Int. Orthop. 35(12), 1863–1868 (2011).Article
Dienstknecht,T。等人。经髂骨内固定器的生物力学分析。内景矫形。35(12),1863–1868(2011)。文章
PubMed
PubMed
PubMed Central
公共医学中心
Google Scholar
谷歌学者
El-Hamalawy, A. G., Karim, M. A., Khaled, S. A., Khaled Fawzy, M. & Abdel-Kader, E. K. Minimally invasive stabilization of posterior pelvic ring injuries through transiliac internal fixator versus Iliosacral screw: A prospective comparative cohort study. Injury 54(6), 1677–1686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2023.02.042 (2023).Article .
El Hamalawy,A.G.,Karim,M.A.,Khaled,S.A.,Khaled Fawzy,M。&Abdel Kader,E.K。通过经髂内固定器与髂骶螺钉微创稳定骨盆后环损伤:一项前瞻性比较队列研究。伤害54(6),1677-1686。https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2023.02.042(2023年)。文章。
Google Scholar
谷歌学者
Salasek, M., Jansova, M., Kren, J., Pavelka, T. & Weisova, D. Biomechanical comparison of a transiliac internal fixator and two iliosacral screws in transforaminal sacral fractures: A finite element analysis. Acta Bioeng. Biomech. 17(1), 39–49 (2015).PubMed
Salasek,M.,Jansova,M.,Kren,J.,Pavelka,T。&Weisova,D。经椎间孔骶骨骨折中经髂内固定器和两个髂骶螺钉的生物力学比较:有限元分析。生物学报。生物技术。17(1),39-49(2015)。PubMed出版社
Google Scholar
谷歌学者
Wagner, D. et al. Space available for trans-sacral implants to treat fractures of the pelvis assessed by virtual implant positioning. Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg. 139(10), 1385–1391 (2019).Article
Wagner,D.等人。通过虚拟植入物定位评估可用于经骶骨植入物治疗骨盆骨折的空间。拱门。骨科。创伤外科139(10),1385-1391(2019)。文章
PubMed
PubMed
Google Scholar
谷歌学者
Wagner, D. et al. Morphometry of the sacrum and its implication on trans-sacral corridors using a computed tomography data-based three-dimensional statistical model. Spine J. 17(8), 1141–1147 (2017).Article
Wagner,D.等人。使用基于计算机断层扫描数据的三维统计模型对骶骨的形态测量及其对经骶走廊的影响。Spine J.17(8),1141–1147(2017)。文章
PubMed
PubMed
Google Scholar
谷歌学者
Hopf, J. C., Krieglstein, C. F., Muller, L. P. & Koslowsky, T. C. Percutaneous iliosacral screw fixation after osteoporotic posterior ring fractures of the pelvis reduces pain significantly in elderly patients. Injury 46(8), 1631–1636 (2015).Article
Hopf,J.C.,Krieglstein,C.F.,Muller,L.P。&Koslowsky,T.C。骨盆骨质疏松性后环骨折后经皮髂骶螺钉固定可显着减轻老年患者的疼痛。伤害46(8),1631-1636(2015)。文章
PubMed
PubMed
Google Scholar
谷歌学者
Osterhoff, G. et al. The pectineal ligament is a secondary stabilizer in anterior pelvic ring fractures - a biomechanical study. Injury 53(2), 334–338 (2022).Article
骨胶韧带是骨盆前环骨折的二级稳定器-一项生物力学研究。伤害53(2),334-338(2022)。文章
PubMed
PubMed
Google Scholar
谷歌学者
Palmer, S., Fairbank, A. C. & Bircher, M. Surgical complications and implications of external fixation of pelvic fractures. Injury 28(9–10), 649–653 (1997).Article
Palmer,S.,Fairbank,A.C。&Bircher,M。骨盆骨折外固定的手术并发症和意义。伤害28(9-10),649-653(1997)。文章
CAS
中科院
PubMed
PubMed
Google Scholar
谷歌学者
Hack, J. et al. Stability of internal versus external fixation in osteoporotic pelvic fractures - a biomechanical analysis. Injury 51(11), 2460–2464 (2020).Article
Hack,J.等人。骨质疏松性骨盆骨折内固定与外固定的稳定性-生物力学分析。伤害51(11),2460–2464(2020)。文章
CAS
中科院
PubMed
PubMed
Google Scholar
谷歌学者
Fang, C., Alabdulrahman, H. & Pape, H. C. Complications after percutaneous internal fixator for anterior pelvic ring injuries. Int. Orthop. 41(9), 1785–1790 (2017).Article
Fang,C.,Alabdulrahman,H。&Pape,H.C。经皮内固定器治疗骨盆前环损伤后的并发症。内景矫形。41(9),1785-1790(2017)。文章
PubMed
PubMed
Google Scholar
谷歌学者
Hesse, D. et al. Femoral nerve palsy after pelvic fracture treated with INFIX: A case series. J. Orthop. Trauma 29(3), 138–143 (2015).Article
Hesse,D。等人。骨盆骨折后用中缀治疗的股神经麻痹:病例系列。J、 骨科。创伤29(3),138-143(2015)。文章
PubMed
PubMed
Google Scholar
谷歌学者
Arduini, M., Saturnino, L., Piperno, A., Iundusi, R. & Tarantino, U. Fragility fractures of the pelvis: Treatment and preliminary results. Aging Clin. Exp. Res. 27(Suppl 1), S61–S67 (2015).Article
Arduini,M.,Saturnino,L.,Piperno,A.,Iundusi,R。&Tarantino,U。骨盆脆性骨折:治疗和初步结果。老年临床。Exp.Res.27(补充1),S61–S67(2015)。文章
PubMed
PubMed
Google Scholar
谷歌学者
Arand, C. et al. Anatomical evaluation of the transpubic screw corridor based on a 3D statistical model of the pelvic ring. Sci. Rep. 11(1), 16677 (2021).Article
Arand,C.等人。基于骨盆环3D统计模型的经骨盆螺钉通道的解剖学评估。Sci。代表11(1),16677(2021)。文章
ADS
广告
CAS
中科院
PubMed
PubMed
PubMed Central
公共医学中心
Google Scholar
谷歌学者
Download referencesAcknowledgementsParts of the present study are also part of the doctoral thesis of Christian Hartung.FundingOpen Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. Funding statement was provided by Mainzer Trauma-Stiftung (Grant No. 2018-01).Author informationAuthors and AffiliationsDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University Medical Center, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131, Mainz, GermanyCharlotte Arand, Christian Hartung, Dorothea Mehler, Erol Gercek, Jochen Wollstädter & Pol M.
下载参考文献致谢本研究的部分内容也是Christian Hartung博士论文的一部分。资金开放获取资金由Projekt交易启用和组织。资金声明由Mainzer Trauma Stiftung提供(批准号2018-01)。作者信息作者和附属机构大学医学中心骨科和创伤科,Langenbeckstraße 155131,美因茨,GermanyCharlotte Arand,Christian Hartung,Dorothea Mehler,Erol Gercek,Jochen Wollstädter&Pol M。
RommensDepartement of Orthopedics and Tramatology, Lausanne University Hospital, Rue du Bugnon 46, 1011, Lausanne, SwitzerlandDaniel WagnerAuthorsCharlotte ArandView author publicationsYou can also search for this author in.
洛桑大学医院骨科和骨科RommensDepartment of Orthopedics and Tramatology,Rue du Bugnon 461011,Lausanne,SwitzerlandDaniel WagnerAuthorsCharlotte ArandView author Publications您也可以在中搜索这位作者。
PubMed Google ScholarChristian HartungView author publicationsYou can also search for this author in
PubMed Google ScholarChristian HartungView作者出版物您也可以在
PubMed Google ScholarDorothea MehlerView author publicationsYou can also search for this author in
PubMed Google ScholarDorothea MehlerView作者出版物您也可以在
PubMed Google ScholarErol GercekView author publicationsYou can also search for this author in
PubMed Google ScholarErol GercekView作者出版物您也可以在
PubMed Google ScholarJochen WollstädterView author publicationsYou can also search for this author in
PubMed巧克力谷歌奖学金Jochen Wollstädter查看作者出版物您也可以在
PubMed Google ScholarDaniel WagnerView author publicationsYou can also search for this author in
PubMed Google ScholardanielWagnerview作者出版物您也可以在
PubMed Google ScholarPol M. RommensView author publicationsYou can also search for this author in
PubMed Google ScholarContributionsC.A. designed and prepared the study, conducted testing, evaluated and analyzed data and wrote the manuscript. C.H. conducted testing and revised the manuscript. D.M. conducted testing and revised the manuscript. E.G. revised the manuscript. J.W.
PubMed谷歌学术贡献中心。A、 设计和准备研究,进行测试,评估和分析数据并撰写手稿。C、 H.进行了测试并修改了手稿。D、 M.进行了测试并修改了手稿。E、 G.修改了手稿。J、 W。
evaluated and analyzed data statistically and revised the manuscript. D.W. designed and prepared the study, revised the manuscript. P.M.R. designed and prepared the study, revised the manuscript.Corresponding authorCorrespondence to.
。D、 W.设计并准备了这项研究,修改了手稿。P、 M.R.设计并准备了这项研究,修改了手稿。对应作者对应。
Charlotte Arand.Ethics declarations
夏洛特·阿兰德。道德宣言
Competing interests
相互竞争的利益
The authors declare no competing interests.
作者声明没有利益冲突。
Additional informationPublisher's noteSpringer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.Rights and permissions
Additional informationPublisher的noteSpringer Nature在已发布地图和机构隶属关系中的管辖权主张方面保持中立。权限和权限
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.
开放获取本文是根据知识共享署名4.0国际许可证授权的,该许可证允许以任何媒体或格式使用,共享,改编,分发和复制,只要您对原始作者和来源给予适当的信任,提供知识共享许可证的链接,并指出是否进行了更改。
The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
本文中的图像或其他第三方材料包含在文章的知识共享许可中,除非在材料的信用额度中另有说明。如果材料未包含在文章的知识共享许可中,并且您的预期用途不受法律法规的许可或超出许可用途,则您需要直接获得版权所有者的许可。
To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/..
要查看此许可证的副本,请访问http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/..
Reprints and permissionsAbout this articleCite this articleArand, C., Hartung, C., Mehler, D. et al. Biomechanical evaluation of an experimental internal ring fixator (RingFix) for stabilization of pelvic ring injuries on an osteoporotic bone model.
转载和许可本文引用本文Arand,C.,Hartung,C.,Mehler,D。等人。用于稳定骨质疏松骨模型骨盆环损伤的实验性内环固定器(RingFix)的生物力学评估。
Sci Rep 14, 20823 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-71138-3Download citationReceived: 28 February 2024Accepted: 26 August 2024Published: 06 September 2024DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-71138-3Share this articleAnyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:Get shareable linkSorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.Copy to clipboard.
《科学报告》1420823(2024)。https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-71138-3Download引文接收日期:2024年2月28日接受日期:2024年8月26日发布日期:2024年9月6日OI:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-71138-3Share本文与您共享以下链接的任何人都可以阅读此内容:获取可共享链接对不起,本文目前没有可共享的链接。复制到剪贴板。
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
由Springer Nature SharedIt内容共享计划提供
KeywordsPelvic ring fractureInsufficiency fractureRing fixatorMinimally-invasive fracture fixation
关键词骨盆环骨折功能不全骨折环固定器终末侵袭性骨折固定
Subjects
主题
BoneFracture repairTrauma
骨折修复创伤
CommentsBy submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.
评论通过提交评论,您同意遵守我们的条款和社区指南。如果您发现有虐待行为或不符合我们的条款或准则,请将其标记为不合适。