EN
登录

抗菌缝合线在口腔手术后控制微生物定植的效果如何?

How well do antibacterial sutures control microbial colonization after oral surgery?

Nature 等信源发布 2024-09-23 03:29

可切换为仅中文


AbstractData sourcesA literature search was conducted through PubMed and Scopus databases to identify articles published from January 2013 to May 2023, using appropriate search terms. There were no language restrictions. Additionally, reference lists of the included studies and key peer-reviewed journals in oral surgery were manually searched for further relevant studies.Study selectionSelection criteria targeted human clinical studies, including cohort studies, randomized clinical trials (RCTs), quasi-experimental studies, case reports, and case series that investigated the antimicrobial activity of antibacterial-coated sutures in oral surgery.

AbstractData sourcesA通过PubMed和Scopus数据库进行文献检索,以使用适当的搜索词识别2013年1月至2023年5月发表的文章。没有语言限制。此外,手动搜索纳入研究的参考列表和口腔外科关键同行评审期刊,以进行进一步的相关研究。研究选择选择标准针对人类临床研究,包括队列研究,随机临床试验(RCT),准实验研究,病例报告和研究口腔手术中抗菌涂层缝合线抗菌活性的病例系列。

Studies were excluded if they were in vitro, ex vivo, or animal studies, as well as if they were non-research or pre-print articles. Two authors independently selected studies, resolving disagreements through discussion or a third expert reviewer.Data extraction and synthesisTwo reviewers independently extracted data, including author, year, country, study design, sample size, population, intervention, control, surgery type, suture removal time, methodology, main results, and additional information.

如果是体外,离体或动物研究,以及如果是非研究或印刷前文章,则排除研究。两位作者独立选择研究,通过讨论或第三位专家审稿人解决分歧。数据提取和综合两位评审员独立提取数据,包括作者,年份,国家,研究设计,样本量,人口,干预,对照,手术类型,缝合线切除时间,方法,主要结果和其他信息。

Discrepancies were resolved through discussion or with input from a third reviewer. This study followed the PRISMA-ScR guidelines for scoping reviews.ResultsOut of 150 identified articles, 129 abstracts were reviewed after removing duplicates, and 10 full-text articles were screened, resulting in the inclusion of 5 studies published between 2014 and 2019.

通过讨论或第三位审稿人的意见解决了差异。本研究遵循PRISMA ScR范围界定审查指南。。

Three were RCTs, with one using a split-mouth design, involving 10 to 40 patients aged 18 to 60 years, primarily healthy. The sutures were mostly braided and coated with triclosan or chlorhexidine, while control groups used various non-coated sutures. Suture removal times ranged fro.

三项是随机对照试验,其中一项采用开口设计,涉及10至40名年龄在18至60岁之间的患者,主要是健康的。缝合线大多是编织的,并涂有三氯生或洗必泰,而对照组使用各种非涂层缝合线。缝合线移除时间为。

Access through your institution

通过您的机构访问

Buy or subscribe

购买或订阅

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

这是订阅内容的预览,可通过您的机构访问

Access options

访问选项

Access through your institution

通过您的机构访问

Access through your institution

通过您的机构访问

Change institution

变革机构

Buy or subscribe

购买或订阅

Subscribe to this journalReceive 4 print issues and online access251,40 € per yearonly 62,85 € per issueLearn moreBuy this articlePurchase on SpringerLinkInstant access to full article PDFBuy nowPrices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

订阅本期刊每年收到4期印刷版和在线访问251,40欧元每期仅62,85欧元了解更多在SpringerLink上购买本文立即访问全文PDFBuy NOW价格可能需要缴纳结帐时计算的当地税费

Additional access options:

其他访问选项:

Log in

登录

Learn about institutional subscriptions

了解机构订阅

Read our FAQs

阅读我们的常见问题

Contact customer support

联系客户支持

ReferencesGeiger D, Debus ES, Ziegler UE, Larena-Avellaneda A, Frosch M, Thiede A, et al. Capillary activity of surgical sutures and suture-dependent bacterial transport: a qualitative study. Surg Infect 2005;6:377–83.Article

参考文献Geiger D,Debus ES,Ziegler UE,Larena Avellaneda A,Frosch M,Thiede A等。手术缝合线的毛细血管活性和缝合线依赖性细菌运输:定性研究。Surg Infect 2005;6: 377-83.文章

Google Scholar

谷歌学者

La Rosa GRM, Scapellato S, Cicciù M, Pedullà E. Antimicrobial activity of antibacterial sutures in oral surgery: a scoping review. Int Dent J. 2024;74:688–95.Article

La Rosa GRM,Scapellato S,CicciùM,PedullàE.口腔外科抗菌缝线的抗菌活性:范围界定综述。Int Dent J.2024;74:688-95.文章

PubMed

PubMed

PubMed Central

公共医学中心

Google Scholar

谷歌学者

Hoshino S, Yoshida Y, Tanimura S, Yamauchi Y, Noritomi T, Yamashita Y. A study of the efficacy of antibacterial sutures for surgical site infection: a retrospective controlled trial. Int Surg. 2013;98:129–32.Article

Hoshino S,Yoshida Y,Tanimura S,Yamauchi Y,Noritomi T,Yamashita Y.抗菌缝线对手术部位感染疗效的研究:一项回顾性对照试验。国际外科2013;98:129–32.文章

PubMed

PubMed

PubMed Central

公共医学中心

Google Scholar

谷歌学者

Sandy-Hodgetts K, Andersen CA, Al-Jalodi O, Serena L, Teimouri C, Serena TE. Uncovering the high prevalence of bacterial burden in surgical site wounds with point-of-care fluorescence imaging. Int Wound J. 2022;19:1438–48.Article

桑迪·霍奇茨(Sandy Hodgetts K),安徒生(Andersen CA),阿尔·贾洛迪(Al-Jalodi O),塞雷纳(Serena L),泰莫里(Teimouri C),塞雷纳(Serena TE)。通过即时荧光成像揭示手术部位伤口细菌负荷的高患病率。;19: 1438-48.文章

PubMed

PubMed

Google Scholar

谷歌学者

Daood U, Ilyas MS, Ashraf M, Akbar M, Asif A, Khan AS, et al. A novel coated suture displays antimicrobial activity without compromising structural properties. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2024.05.004.Alzacko SM, Majid OW. “Security loop” tie: a new technique to overcome loosening of surgical knots.

Daood U,Ilyas MS,Ashraf M,Akbar M,Asif A,Khan AS等。一种新型涂层缝合线在不损害结构特性的情况下显示出抗菌活性。《口腔颌面外科杂志》,2024年。https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2024.05.004.Alzacko山猫,马吉德。“安全环”结:一种克服手术结松动的新技术。

Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007;104:e1–4.Article .

口腔外科口腔医学口腔病理学口腔放射性Endod。2007年;104:e1-4。文章。

PubMed

PubMed

Google Scholar

谷歌学者

Asher R, Chacartchi T, Tandlich M, Shapira L, Polak D. Microbial accumulation on different suture materials following oral surgery: a randomized controlled study. Clin Oral Investig. 2019;23:559–65.Article

Asher R,Chacartchi T,Tandlich M,Shapira L,Polak D.口腔手术后不同缝合材料上的微生物积累:一项随机对照研究。临床口腔调查。2019年;23:559–65.文章

PubMed

PubMed

Google Scholar

谷歌学者

Leaper D, Wilson P, Assadian O, Edmiston C, Kiernan M, Miller A, et al. The role of antimicrobial sutures in preventing surgical site infection. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2017;99:439–43.Article

Leaper D,Wilson P,Assadian O,Edmiston C,Kiernan M,Miller A等。抗菌缝线在预防手术部位感染中的作用。Ann R Coll Surg Engl。2017年;99:439–43.文章

CAS

中科院

PubMed

PubMed

PubMed Central

公共医学中心

Google Scholar

谷歌学者

Download referencesAuthor informationAuthors and AffiliationsDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Dentistry, Mosul University, Mosul, IraqOmer Waleed MajidAuthorsOmer Waleed MajidView author publicationsYou can also search for this author in

下载参考文献作者信息作者和附属机构摩苏尔大学牙科学院口腔颌面外科,摩苏尔,伊拉克默尔·瓦利德·马吉德作者或瓦利德·马吉德维尤作者出版物您也可以在

PubMed Google ScholarCorresponding authorCorrespondence to

PubMed谷歌学者通讯社

Omer Waleed Majid.Ethics declarations

。道德宣言

Competing interests

相互竞争的利益

The author declares no competing interests.

作者声明没有利益冲突。

Additional informationPublisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.Rights and permissionsReprints and permissionsAbout this articleCite this articleMajid, O.W. How well do antibacterial sutures control microbial colonization after oral surgery?..

Additional informationPublisher的注释Springer Nature在已发布的地图和机构隶属关系中的管辖权主张方面保持中立。权利和许可打印和许可本文引用本文Majid,O.W。抗菌缝线在口腔手术后控制微生物定植的程度如何?。。

Evid Based Dent (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41432-024-01069-5Download citationReceived: 01 September 2024Accepted: 03 September 2024Published: 23 September 2024DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41432-024-01069-5Share this articleAnyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:Get shareable linkSorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.Copy to clipboard.

基于Evid的Dent(2024)。https://doi.org/10.1038/s41432-024-01069-5Download引文接收日期:2024年9月1日接受日期:2024年9月3日发布日期:2024年9月23日OI:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41432-024-01069-5Share本文与您共享以下链接的任何人都可以阅读此内容:获取可共享链接对不起,本文目前没有可共享的链接。复制到剪贴板。

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

由Springer Nature SharedIt内容共享计划提供